The US Congress launched what was described as a “cryptol week” on Capitol Hill, the Republicans pushing the legislation on digital assets and the Democrats framing effort as a coverage of cryptographic “corruption”. But instead of focusing on the crypto, the opening arguments quickly moved to defense expenses.
At a meeting on Monday of the Rules Committee of the Chamber of the United States, the representative of Massachusetts, Jim McGovern, used his declaration of openness to excite the Republican legislators and President Donald Trump for their attempts to pass three cryptographic bills: the law on the digital asset market and the Clarity) and the law on digital assets and the law the state of surveillance of digital assets.
McGovern qualified bills as the “Crypto gift of the GOP”, criticizing the legislation to offer “weak and ineffective” regulatory solutions to the detriment of investors.
“I did not have a person in my district who comes to me and said to me:” Please, please Jim, facilitate cryptographic millionaires to become richer, please facilitate people, “said McGovern. “However, that’s exactly what’s going on here.”
“This is not innovation – it is corruption […] These bills even cut special treatments for Trump’s personal cryptography companies. »»
The representative of North Carolina, Virginia Foxx, who chairs the committee, opened with a general overview of the three bills of Crypto and the law on credits of the Ministry of Defense. It started with allegations on the law on engineering, suggesting that Republicans could prioritize the Stablecoin invoice on the structure of the market and the regulation of CBDC.
“This legislation is historic, and it will help to propel responsible innovation in America and will lead us to obtain an even stronger foot within the global financial system,” said Foxx, referring to the Act on Engineering.
In relation: The “crypto week” is approaching: will these three Pro-Crypto bills pass?
Crypto invoices may need bipartite support to pass
Many Democrats in the Congress, where the Republicans have a thin majority and may need the support of the other party to adopt the three bills, have rejected the legislation.
The legislators, including representative Maxine Waters and Senator Adam Schiff, cited conflicts of potential interests of the president through his cryptographic company backed by the World Liberty Financial, ITS Stablecoin, USD1 and its same, official Trump (Trump).
At the time of publication, the debate within the Chamber Committee had moved to discussions on the law on the credits of the Ministry of Defense, but should soon return to digital assets.
The Republican leaders of the Chamber suggested that they intended to pass the three bills before the recess of the August Congress, giving them less than two weeks.
Review: Bitcoin vs stablecoins.
