Big Tech Executives Criticize EU AI Regulation For Stifling Innovation


The main leaders of giant technological companies Google and Meta have expressed their concerns that strict artificial intelligence (AI) regulatory regulations are stifling innovation.
These concerns align with the criticism of the administration of Donald Trump, who accused the EU of prioritizing the regulations on innovation. Remember that the American vice-president JD Vance, while speaking to the summit of the action of artificial intelligence in Paris at the beginning of the month, revealed that the Trump administration will work to make the United States the “Gold Standard around the world” for artificial because he has issued solid warnings against political speech regulations.
The vice-president also urged European governments to “turn to this new border with optimism, rather than to appreciate” and warned that the “excessive regulations” of AI technologies could “kill a transformative industry” .
Register For TEKEDIA Mini-MBA Edition 16 (February 10 – May 3, 2025)) Today for early reductions.
Tekedia Ai in Masterclass Business open registration.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-INivest in large world startups.
Register become a better CEO or director with CEO program and director of Tekedia.
Speaking recently at the Techarena Tech Conference in Stockholm, Sweden, the public policy leaders of Google and Meta, argued that the strict regulatory framework of the European Union, including the AL and the RGPD law, delay Product launches and embarrass technological progress.
Chris Yiu, director of public policies at Meta, criticized the EU’s regulatory approach, calling it fragmented and too restrictive. “Sometimes it is too fragmented, like the GDPR, sometimes it goes too far, like al Act,” Yiu said. He argued that these regulations finally harmed European consumers by delaying innovative products.
For example, Yiu presented Ray-Ban Glasses to Meta Ray-Ban, which offer a translation of language in real time and image descriptions for visually disorders. He stressed that regulatory obstacles have slowed their European deployment, because Meta was to navigate in accordance with complex EU regulations.

Dorothy Chou, the head of the Google Deepmind public policy, also criticized the calendar of the AL law, noting that it was introduced before al-Chatgpt models, as Chatgpt even appeared. “There is a way to use a policy to create a better investment environment,” she said, citing the American law on inflation reduction as an example of regulation adapted to companies.
“I think what is difficult is when you regulate on a time scale that does not Make the technology match. I think what we have to do is both regulating to ensure that there is a responsible application of technology, while Also ensure that the industry thrives in all good manners ”, Chou added.
Technological companies would have increased lobbying efforts to postpone the AL law, arguing that it imposes impractical and technically impracticable requirements. Recently, Meta’s World Affairs Director Joel Kaplan suggested that the company would not respect the code of practice proposed by the EU for AL models for general use, soothing it too restrictive.

In particular, American technology giants are fighting against EU EU regulations, are accompanied by the support of US President Donald Trump. These companies have confidence in their efforts to challenge EU regulations, believing that the support of the Trump administration will allow them to fight what they consider hostile rules on artificial intelligence and market domination.
The owner of Facebook Meta led this year this year against the AI law of ET, according to people familiar with his strategy, with technological lobbyists of the block believing that they can succeed in watering the implementation of ‘A law considered as the strictest regime in the world on advanced technology.
Meanwhile, in the middle of the call for EU rules, dozens of technological companies have already called the EU to properly apply its digital rules accusing large technological companies of seeking to mobilize the Trump administration and to Small potential competitors.
The Virkkunen of the Commission said that lobbying would not change its rules, reminding American companies that the European Union is one of the biggest markets in Big Tech.