A collective declaration of 31 Bitcoin Core developers sparked a global debate between bitcoiners after suggesting a practical approach to the way the Bitcoin network is used, in the midst of continuous controversy on non -monetary use cases.
“This does not approve or to tolerate the use of non -financial data, but by accepting that as a system resistant to censorship, Bitcoin can and will be used for use cases that everyone does not agree,” the June 6 release published on the Bitcoin Core website said.
Bitcoins are “not in position” to place mandates
The letter argued that Bitcoin is a network “defined by its users” and that its main contributors are “not in position” to demand the software or the policies they wish. He arrives in the middle of the current debate on spam registrations on the Bitcoin network.
“Being free to execute software is the main backup of the network against coercion,” he added.
While many bitcoinders have taken care of the update with an “ACK” comment, others have opposed.
Jan3 CEO Samson Mow criticized the tone of the letter the same day. He said: “It is falsified to say” that’s what it’s now, too bad. “”
“The Bitcoin core developers have gradually changed the network to allow spam and now seem to be deleted on the barriers for spammers,” said MOW. “This declaration itself is also inappropriate,” he added.
On May 8, Bitcoin Core developers decided to delete a long -standing limit of transaction data in network upgrade to allow larger data segments, which some bitcoins have seen the door to non -financial use.
However, the founder of Casa, Jameson Lopp, defended the letter. LOPP said: “Basic developers are a group saying that we cannot force anyone to execute the code they do not like; Here is our reflection on the relay policy and the health of the network. ”
“When there was no cohesive message, and it was only a group of independent developers making individual statements, Bitcoin Core was accused of having” bad public relations “, said LOPP, adding:
“Now a joint statement is published, and people find reasons to cry about it.”
The developers have argued in the letter that it is preferable that the Bitcoin node software “aims to have a realistic idea of what will end in the following block, rather than trying to intervene between the creators of transactions and the consenting minors to discourage activity which is largely harmless to a technical level.” He added:
“Although we recognize that this point of view is not universally kept by all users and developers, it is our sincere conviction that it is in the best interest of Bitcoin and its users, and we hope that our users agree.”
In relation: Is a Bitcoin price rally possible by the end of the year?
Bitcoiner Carl Horton said: “It’s a bit” coins “, not a” bucket “or a” store “or a data store for general purposes that you have in mind. It is an “electronic cash system by peers”.
Meanwhile, the developer of Bitcoin Core, Luke Dashjr, criticized the objectives of the transaction relay policy described in the declaration. “The objectives of the transaction relay listed are fundamentally false,” said Dashjr.
“Predding what will be exploited is a centralization objective. Waiting spam is exploited is defeatism. Helping spam to spread is harmful,” said Dashjr.
The developers said that the main objectives of the transaction relay predicted Bitcoin transactions, “accelerating the propagation of the blocks” for transactions which should be extracted and helping Bitcoin minors to discover paid transactions.
Review: Baby-boomers worth $ 79 t finally get on board with Bitcoin
