Bitcoin Treasury Model Faces Collapse — Strategy Stands Strong

Bitcoin Treasury in 2025: a pressure corporate reserve strategy
By 2025, the Bitcoin treasure model reached critical mass. More than 250 organizations, including public enterprises, private companies, ETFs and pension funds, now hold BTC on their balance sheets.
The trend of the Bitcoin treasure model (BTC) was ignited by the Bitcoin plan of Michael Saylor, with the pioneering strategy for the use of Bitcoin as a business reserve asset in 2020.
What started as a coverage against inflation has become a financial game book adopted by a new class of Bitcoin portfolio companies, some structured to resemble quasi-exchange funds (ETF).
The Bitcoin strategy of the strategy remains the largest scale, but the wider BTC business treasure movement is now faced with increasing pressure. The model is based on a simple thesis: increasing capital, converting it to a cryptographic asset wearing the offer and waiting for a long -term appreciation.
However, the volatility of the Bitcoin price exposes these companies to significant risks of the Bitcoins Business Treasury. Suppose that the course of the action of a company slides too close to (or less) of the value of its underlying bitcoin, known as the Bitcoin-Pera or Net metric value (NAV).
Once the premium nav (MNAV) multiple is evaporated, investors’ confidence collapses. MNAV measures the value of the market value of a Bitcoin restraint company compared to the value of its BTC reserves.
A recent Bitcoin VC breed report describes how this scenario can trigger a Nav BTC death spiral: the drop in prices erode NAV, reduce equity or debt companies and force companies in distress to sell their bitcoin in a drop in the market, accelerating the recession.
Did you know? MNAV (Multiple of the value of net assets) shows how (or less) the market is more of a Bitcoin relaxation company than its real BTC reserve. It is calculated as: Mnav = Business value ÷ Bitcoin Nav.
BTC Nav Risk: The Mnav death spiral, explained
The “spiral of death” begins with a sharp drop in the price of bitcoin. This reduces the Nav bonus of a company (the evaluation stamp which gives its actions raises it).
As the market capitalization contracts, access to a new capital is tightening. Without buyers or lenders, companies cannot extend their assets or refinance the financing of the existing Bitcoin debt. For companies based on this BTC Equity vs debt strategy, cracks are starting to show.
If loans ripen or margin calls are struck, forced liquidations follow. The sale of BTC to comply with the obligations more depresses the price of the assets, resulting in other companies closer to their own spiral. In this environment, even minor shocks can trigger cascade failures.
The BREED VC report warns that only companies retaining a strong MNAV bonus and the growth of their Bitcoin-Per-Party assets can escape the collapse. Others can be acquired or underlying, which leads to a new consolidation of the industry.
Fortunately, most Bitcoin vouchers in 2025 still depend on joint -stock financing rather than the high lever effect. This reduces the risk of contagion, as shareholders’ losses are more likely than systemic benefits.
However, the situation could change. A pivot towards aggressive loans would increase the issues. If entities strongly with leverage relax, they could endanger the creditors, distribute the damage by the market and undermine the long -term faith in the Bitcoin Treasury model.
Even now, follow -up sites like BitcoinTheries.org show an increasing divergence: while the performance of the BTC of stratumment remain resilient, weaker imitators vacillate.
As exposure to FNB and BTC pension fund increases, the pressure to separate disciplined execution from blind accumulation has never been greater.
Did you know? BTC buys through cash companies barely moves the market, generally. Bitcoin purchases generally affect less than 1% of the daily volume (except days when the strategy buys, when they represented up to around 9%).
Bitcoin plan of the strategy: why the Saylor treasure model still works
While the wider model of the Bitcoin treasure shows cracks, the Strategy Bitcoin strategy continues to stand out as a rare success.
Under the Bitcoin plan of Michael Saylor, the company has methodically built a dominant position, holding more than half a million BTC by mid-2025, more than half of all Bitcoins held by public companies.
Above all, the actions of the strategy are always negotiated with an important premium of its Bitcoin navigation (generally 1.7-2.0 times its underlying navigation). These MNAV premium signals have maintained the confidence of investors, based not only on its BTC assets, but on the capacity of the company to continue to develop its Bitcoin metric by sharing thanks to a disciplined capital strategy.
Rather than relying solely on leverage, the strategy uses a balanced BTC equity strategy compared to debt. On the equity side, he used market offers to sell new actions to high assessments, recycling proceeds to more bitcoin without excessive dilution.
On the debt side, he issued convertible tickets with low interest, which are structured to convert into shares only if the prices of the strategy increase. This allows access to capital while minimizing immediate dilution. Although he briefly used guaranteed loans, the company left these positions early, attenuating the risk of financing Bitcoin debt linked to margin calls.
This approach enabled the strategy to double its BTC participations every 16 to 18 months, surpassing other Bitcoin portfolio companies both in accumulation and in market trust.
As Adam on Saylor noted, the company premium is a reflection of its composed execution, regularly increasing the BTC by action while maintaining solvency and optionality. Unlike companies that simply hold BTC, the strategy actively manages its treasure as an asymmetrical bet on a weighted cryptographic asset, one with long -term volatility.
The company has also demonstrated resilience during market slowdowns. Even in the midst of price shocks and a Nav BTC death spiral for certain peers, the strategy has retained its MNAV premium by clearly communicating with investors, maintaining the debt maintenance and a opportunistic manner of funds are opportunistic through distress sales.
Did you know? The stock of the strategy has exceeded Bitcoin itself. Over the past five years, its shares have soaked around 3,000%, far exceeding Bitcoin (around 1,000%) and even the Nvidia chip giant (around 1,500%).
Future of Bitcoin’s vouchers and MNAV cryptography companies
For the future, Bitcoin vouchers in 2025 enter a consolidation phase.
Only a handful of companies are likely to maintain their MNAV premiums. The weakest players (especially those who have been suspended or lacking in investors) can deal with acquisition, collapse or non-all.
The credibility of the example and the strategy market makes it the reference. The new entrants in the category of Crypto MNAV companies will have to differentiate themselves by offering new value, unique structures or an improvement in capital efficiency. The simple fact of being a Bitcoin de corporate reserve can no longer be enough.
Meanwhile, plates move as exposure to FNB and the BTC pension fund is developing. With traditional finance offering new ways to access Bitcoin, from ETF to institutional guard, the call for Bitcoin Proxy Bitcoin actions could fade. If the ETFs gain in traction, they can siphon at the request of companies such as the strategy, by shrinking the MNAV premium and by compressing the evaluations.
However, the long -term thesis remains intact: Bitcoin is a cryptographic asset wearing the offer and the dynamics of rarity will result in value. The question is who can hold by volatility without having to sell. Companies with high leverage and low governance are most at risk. Those relying on equity can dilute, but they will survive the following slowdown.
The risk of business bitcoin cash is real, but not insurmountable. The strategy has established a game book: use strategically capital, keep investors and stay aligned in the long term.
For others in space, survival may depend on the way they can adapt this approach before the next rate of slowdown in the BTC market becomes reality.