“If War Is What The U.S. Wants, We’re Ready To Fight Till The End”: China Vows To Fight U.S. Tariffs

China has promised to return all the energies given by the United States while President Trump continued his commercial prices, announced last month as a means of slowing down the threat of China fentanyl.

In a press release on Wednesday, the spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry underlined the preparation of Beijing to equal the energy of the United States while the new prices for new prices take effect. The brutal warning noted that China is “ready to fight until the end” for “any type of war” that the United States wants.

Trump, in an address at prospective hours at Congress, tried to minimize the repercussions of his aggressive trade policy, only conceding that his new stiff prices would cause “a little disturbance”. However, experts have warned that economic benefits can be much more important than the president suggests.

The impact of prices

The 25% prices of 25% newly imposed in Canada, Mexico and China are part of the wider strategy of Trump to reset trade sales and put pressure on foreign governments to make concessions. However, these prices work as taxes on imported goods, and costs are often transmitted directly to American consumers and businesses.

The prices on Chinese products, in particular, target a wide range of products – electronics and household appliances with industrial clothing and components. Many of these items are basic products in American or essential households for the manufacture of supply chains. The cost increase should filter retail prices, which potentially results in higher costs for daily items such as smartphones, laptops, clothing and even children’s toys.

As tensions are intensifying, China does not decrease, but rather, the preparation of a robust response that could plunge global markets into a deeper uncertainty.

In a detailed declaration, the Chinese Foreign Ministry has criticized the use by the United States of the fentanyl crisis as a “fragile excuse” to justify the new prices.

“The United States, no one else, is responsible for #Fentanylcrisis in the United States in the spirit of humanity and goodwill towards the American people, we have taken robust measures to help the United States deal with the problem. Instead of recognizing our efforts, the United States has sought to dirty and blame itself in China, and seek to put pressure on and make China sing with pricing hikes, “the statement said.

“They punished us for helping them. This will not solve the problem of the United States and undermine our dialogue and cooperation to the Commissioner. »»

China’s spokesman also clearly said that Beijing would not go back to intimidation.

“I bullying does not scare us. The intimidation does not work on us. Pressure, coercion or threats are not the right way to deal with China. Anyone who uses a maximum pressure on China picks the bad guy and puts it badly calculated. »»

The declaration ended with a daring declaration: “If the war is what the United States wants, whether it is a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we are ready to fight until the end.”

Global and economic fallout

China is not alone in its answer. Canada and Mexico, both of which were the main American business partners, also retaliated with their own prices. Canada has imposed tasks on a variety of American goods, strategically targeting products from politically influential states. Mexico, an important market for American agricultural products, imposed prices for American farm exports, directly threatening an industry already in difficulty.

The European Union has also prepared countermeasures, warning that prices on American products such as bourbon, motorcycles and blue jeans could take effect if Trump continues its protectionist policies.

In total, reprisal rates from all affected countries cover billions of dollars in American products, creating a training effect that could affect agriculture industries in automotive manufacturing.

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, representing most of the main car manufacturers, warned that prices in Canada and Mexico could trigger price increases of up to 25% on certain models of cars. This would not only affect consumers, but could also cause job losses in the automotive sector, which is based strongly on cross -border supply chains.

The financial markets reacted negatively to the current trade war. American actions have dropped for the second consecutive day, Trump’s prices, and economic analysts warn against increased volatility to come.

Despite the suggestion of the Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, that a compromise with Canada and Mexico could be imminent, Trump gave no indication during his speech. Instead, he doubled his requests, in particular on the issue of drug trafficking.

“Mexico and Canada have to do much more than they have done, and they have to stop the fentanyl and drugs flowing in the United States,” said Trump.

However, the narrative linking prices to the fentanyl crisis has been widely criticized. It is unlikely that experts argue that the taxation of prices on imported goods will address the complex issue of drug smuggling and could in place harm the legitimate trade and economic stability.

American households in cross -fires

For American consumers, the impact could be both fast and draining. The prices of everyday goods should increase as importers pass the costs of prices. Small businesses, especially those that depend on imported materials, may have trouble absorbing additional expenses.

The National Retail Federation has urged the Trump administration to reconsider its approach, stressing that prices are essentially a tax on American consumers.

“The prices are not paid by foreign governments. They are paid here at home by American families and companies, “said Matthew Shay, CEO of the National Retail Federation.

For many, Trump’s prices represent a broken challenge bet that could reshape the dynamics of world trade. Although the president remains confident that his strategy will lead to “billions of billions and billions of dollars” and to a “boom in the automotive industry”, many economists warn that the risks prevail over potential rewards.