Sergey Brin Uses AI to Manage People: Decide Promotions and Delegate Work at Google’s AI Division
The co -founder of Google, Sergey Brin, adopts artificial intelligence not only to create products, but to manage people.
In a recent episode of the Podcast All in Podcast on Tuesday, Brin revealed that it was based on AI to manage leadership tasks in Gemini, the model unit in large language of Google, where it returned in 2023 to help direct the efforts of the technology giant in the climbing of AI Race.
Since he moved away from his executive role in 2019, Brin has largely stayed behind the scenes. But his return coincided with a pivotal moment for Google, which repels fierce competition from Openai, Anthropic and Perplexity.
Register For TEKEDIA Mini-MBA Edition 17 (June 9 – September 6, 2025)) Today for early reductions. An annual for access to Blurara.com.
Tekedia Ai in Masterclass Business open registration.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-INivest in large world startups.
Register become a better CEO or director with CEO program and director of Tekedia.
From now on, Brin uses the very tools that his company is developing to manage the teams – automating everything, from the delegation of assignments to the identification of employees should be promoted.
“Management is like the easiest thing to do with AI,” said strand on the podcast, describing how he uses artificial intelligence to analyze group cats and assign responsibilities between teams.
“It could suck up an entire cat space and then answer fairly complicated questions. I said to myself:” Ok, summarizes that for me. Ok, now attributes something so that everyone can work. “”
He admitted that the cutting style and sticking with his answers made it obvious that he used AI, but that did not matter – he did the job.
“It worked well remarkably,” he added.
Perhaps more surprising was the revelation of the strand that he had used the tool to recommend a promotion. By analyzing group chat activity, AI pointed out a silent engineer who had not attracted a lot of attention during meetings but who made exceptional work behind the scenes.
“He in fact chose this young woman engineer whom I did not even notice, she was not very vocal,” said Brin. “I spoke to the manager, in fact, and he said to me:” Yeah, what do you know? You’re right. As if she worked very hard, all these things have done. “”
The promotion, added Brin, “ended up happening”.
While AI is widely tested in customer service, logistics and even coding, the Brin’s experience reflects an emerging border: using AI to make decisions that directly affect people’s careers. His approach already raises questions about the implications of AI -assisted leadership, especially in companies where management decisions shape both the innovation and culture of the workplace.
But it’s not just bit. Other technology leaders also integrate AI into their daily routines. The CEO of Nvidia, Jensen Huang, recently said that he used tools like Chatgpt and Gemini as daily tutors to break down complex subjects.
“I could say:” Start by explaining it as if I was a 12 -year -old child “, then progress in a doctoral level,” said Huang.
The Duolingo CTO also revealed this week that AI plays a key role in its three -step leadership method – revealing whether a task should be delegated, delayed or automated with Chatgpt.
However, not all leaders are ready to hand over the management tasks to a machine. Linkedin COO chief Dan Shapero recently told Business Insider that although IA can digest and summarize the information, she still does not miss the human side of leadership.
“I’m not sure it is shown that it can inspire a team or that it can connect with people at a deeper level,” he said.
For Brin, the approach seems to be anchored in the belief that AI can outdo humans in certain management tasks. He said on the podcast that AI was already better than him in mathematics and coding – two areas in which he once excelled. Delegating management, he hinted, was simply the next logical step.
His practical approach could point out how high -level corporate decisions could soon be informed, or discreetly decided, by algorithms as the AI revolution is accelerating. However, it is not clear for the moment if it leads to more meritocratic results or introduces new biases. What is clear given the Brin’s experience is that leadership, formerly considered one of the last human bastions in the workplace, is no longer immune to disturbances.
