At T1 2025, Solara would have directed all the blockchains of the layer 1 in income, generating $ 370 million in fees, exceeding Ethereum, Tron, BNB channelAnd others, according to articles on X and the sources of industry. This turnover includes costs, advice and maximum extractable value (MEV), with high solara transactions demand by its scalability and low -cost transactions. Solana’s ability to treat up to 65,000 transactions per second, facilitated by its Proof of history (POH) and proof of stake (POS) The consensus mechanisms have fueled its domination in the activity on the chain, in particular in the trade in memes and decentralized finance (DEFI).
In addition, Solana has exceeded Ethereum By stimulating market capitalization, reaching $ 53.15 billion compared to the $ 53.72 billion in Ethereum. About 64.86% of the total Solana supply is jacqué, which gives an annual percentage (APY) yield of 8.31%, significantly higher than the supply of 28.18% Ethereum with an APY of 2.98%. Solana’s call for stupidness is reinforced by its low entry barrier (0.01 minimum soil) and the growth of liquid stretch protocols, although its lack of reduction mechanism has raised security problems among critics.
Although Solana’s performance measures are impressive, some maintain that its income and puncture figures can be inflated by a speculative activity, such as trading meme parts, and call into question its long -term sustainability compared to the more mature challenge ecosystem of Ethereum. The higher total value of Located Ethereum (TVL) and the base of the developers always make it a formidable competitor, despite the functioning of the first quarter of Solana. Always plan to reference these measures with primary blockchain data, as the figures reported may vary and may not fully reflect the health or decentralization of the network.
Register For TEKEDIA Mini-MBA Edition 17 (June 9 – September 6, 2025)) Today for early reductions. An annual for access to Blurara.com.
Tekedia Ai in Masterclass Business open registration.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-INivest in large world startups.
Register become a better CEO or director with CEO program and director of Tekedia.
The $ 370 million in Solana revenues report high demand from users and network activity, especially in high speed applications such as trading of parts even and defi. Its ability to manage 65,000 transactions per second at low cost positions it as an essential platform for retail users and developers building evolutionary DAPPs, which potentially restores the domination of Ethereum in Defi and NFT markets. With a market capitalization of 53.15 billion dollars and 64.86% of its stakeholder supply, the high participation rate of Solana strengthens network security and the decentralization of the validator. The 8.31% APY attracts investors, but the absence of a reduction mechanism could arouse concerns about the validator’s responsibility, potentially exposing the network to risks if the malicious behavior becomes unpunished.
Solana’s profitability and performance move away from Ethereum developers, where high gas costs remain a barrier. This could accelerate the development of DAPP on Solana, in particular in games, challenge and social finance (Socialfi), but the community of rooted developers of Ethereum and robust tools (for example, EVM compatibility) can slow this change. Critics point out that Solana’s revenues are partly motivated by the speculative trading of memes parts, which may not be durable in the long term. If speculative activity passes, Solana’s revenues could decrease unless it is diversified in the event of more stable use such as real assets or business applications.
Solana’s advance exerts pressure on Ethereum to optimize its scaling solutions, such as layer 2 rollers, and reduce costs to keep users. The higher TVL of Ethereum ($ 51 billion against $ 10 billion in Solana) and institutional adoption still give it an advantage, but Solana’s performance could force Ethereum to accelerate improvements such as rupture barriers or downward barriers. Solana’s parameters strengthen its appeal for investors, the soil price potentially benefiting from its income and its domination of staggered. However, volatility linked to speculative exchanges and macroeconomic factors (for example, interest rates) could temper gains. Investors should weigh the top of Solana’s APY against risks such as network failures, which have historically tormented Solana.
The high flow of Solana is based on relatively centralized infrastructure (fewer more powerful validators), which raises concerns concerning resistance to censorship compared to the more decentralized validators of Ethereum. This could have an impact on long -term confidence among users prioritizing the ideological principles of blockchain. The rapid growth of Solana can stretch its infrastructure, risking congestion or breakdowns if the transaction volumes increase more. In addition, dependence on liquid ignition protocols has counterpart risks, as seen in past challenges.
To navigate these implications, stakeholders should monitor Solana’s ability to maintain income beyond speculative trends, improve decentralization and maintain network stability. Ethereum’s response – scaling or discounts of costs – will also shape the competitive landscape. Always check the data on data and network health.
