The Blockchain SU is under control more and more after supporting a controversial proposal for the protocol of the DEFI Cetus platform to recover $ 162 million in frozen active ingredients.
This decision follows an incident of May 21 during which Cetus lost more than $ 223 million against a pirate. In response, more than a third of the Validators SU have frozen part of the stolen assets by refusing to process the transactions of two portfolios which would be linked to the attacker.
SUI’s support for Cetus’s plan raises questions about decentralization
Cetus offered a bonus of $ 6 million to the pirate to recover the remaining funds. However, the offer has aroused strong criticism from the members of the community who argue that it is too weak.
At the same time, Cetus puts pressure for an upgrade of the protocol to return the frozen funds. The proposal aims to achieve this without modifying the historical recordings of the blockchain or the return of transactions.
Although this approach is formulated as a compromise, it sparked debates on the integrity of the decentralization of Sui.
Meanwhile, the Foundation Suis agreed to support a chain vote, but said that it will remain neutral and refrain from participating.
“Earlier in the day, Cetus called for a community vote on upgrading the protocol to return the frozen funds, without restarting the history of the chain or the inversion of transactions. This is an extraordinary demand in response to extraordinary needs – Cetus customer funds are at stake.
The Foundation also said that Cetus must use all of its available financial resources to compensate for users assigned until it reimburses all losses.
Critics warn that the freezing of intelligent contracts can be problematic even without reverse the chain. They argue that censorship transactions can also undermine the principle of blockchain’s immutability.
The premium offer attracts indignation
Meanwhile, the decision of the Foundation suis to offer a reward of $ 5 million aroused new controversy. The target bonus anyone who can provide information leading to the identification of the pirate.
The Zachxbt chain investigator described the premium as “wave” and useless. He argued that such offers only pay success and do not compensate for the time and significant efforts that investigators invest in advance.
Yu Xian, co-founder of the security company Blockchain Slowmist, also criticized the offer. He warned that in less than a hacker only returns the funds or faces the pressure to do so, investigators often find themselves in prosecution with little hope of resolution.
“The cost of investment of follow -up services is very uncertain, such as the coordination of resources of the intelligence network cooperation network, communication of stolen users, law communication, survey and collection of evidence, fixing evidence, promoting negotiation, analysis reports, etc. If there is no initial cost or cooperation resources deep enough to guarantee, it is difficult to continue to move forward, “added Xian.
Non-liability clause
In membership of the Trust project guidelines, Beincrypto has embarked on transparent impartial reports. This press article aims to provide precise and timely information. However, readers are invited to check the facts independently and consult a professional before making decisions according to this content. Please note that our terms and conditions, our privacy policy and our non-responsibility clauses have been updated.
