The gap between the patriots and the globalists was shaped by influential figures that embody or amplify these ideologies through their actions, their rhetoric or their platforms. US President Donald Trump Popularized the mantra “America First”, supervising globalism as a threat to national sovereignty. His 2019 United Nations speech said: “The future belongs to the patriots”, galvanizing nationalist feelings around the world.
French politician Marine Le Pen Rejects traditional left-right labels, positioning itself as a patriot with globalist elites like Emmanuel Macron. His rhetoric emphasizes French identity and criticizes the cultural erosion of globalization. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán; The champions “illiberal democracy”, prioritize national culture and sovereignty on the integration of the EU, inspiring similar movements across Europe. British politician Nigel Farage led the Brexit campaign, considering it as a patriotic recovery of the UK independence from the globalist structures of the EU.
Globalists
French president Emmanuel Macron Deeper European integration defeats and global cooperation on issues such as climate change. Criticist by nationalists as an ellitist, he argues that globalization is an opportunity, not a threat. Former American president Barrack Obama has promoted international trade and multilateralism agreements, often cited as a figure in criticism. The founder of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab has associated ideas for “great reset”, seen by patriots as pushing a centralized global program focused on the elite.
Register For TEKEDIA Mini-MBA Edition 17 (June 9 – September 6, 2025)) Today for early reductions. An annual for access to Blurara.com.
Tekedia Ai in Masterclass Business open registration.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-INivest in large world startups.
Register become a better CEO or director with CEO program and director of Tekedia.
UN Secretary General António Guterres represents multilateralism, pleading for global solutions to crises, which certain patriots consider to undermine national priorities. The political strategist Steve Bannon shaped Trump’s nationalist account, supervising the globalists as adversaries of “common man”. Its influence extends to populist movements in Europe. The philanthropist George Soros finances progressive causes on a global scale, often vilified by patriots as a symbol of globalist interference. Mentioned in online discussions as a key figure.
These figures do not work in isolation: media, thoughts and basic movements amplify their messages. For example, Patriot’s influencers on platforms like X Often bring together against globalist policies, while globalist ideas are gaining ground in international forums as Davos. The ditch is not black and white. Some, like Macron, claim the patriotic roots while adopting global cooperation, complicating the story.
Donald Trump’s actions as a key figure of the Patriot movement have considerably shaped the fracture with the globalists, emphasizing nationalism and skepticism of world executives. “First of all” foreign policy; Withdrawal of the Paris climate agreement (2017): argued that it has disadvantaged American economic interests, prioritizing national industry on global environmental cooperation. Withdrawn from the Iranian nuclear agreement; Rejected multilateral diplomacy, citing threats to us and Israeli security, defying globalist calls to negotiation.
NATO criticized allies (2018-2020): Members have forced to increase defense spending, supervising the alliance as the exploitation of American resources, which calls into question globalist dependence on collective security. Prices imposed on China (2018-2019 and now 2025). Launched the trade war to protect American jobs, accusing world trade agreements of weakening American manufacturing. Targeted imports with prices up to 145%, increasing tensions with global markets. Replaced the “globalist” trade agreement with the one favoring American workers, emphasizing bilateral transactions on multilateral executives in 2018.
Critical organization of global trade: Calls him unfair to American interests, blocking appointments to his appeal organization (2019), undermining the governance of world trade. Prohibition to travel (2017): Restricted entry of several countries with a majority Muslim, prioritizing national security on the globalist of calls for open borders and inclusiveness. Pushed for a physical barrier along the American-mexic border, symbolizing resistance to uncontrolled migration, a flash point for globalist critics. Politics “remain in Mexico” implemented, forcing asylum seekers to wait outside the American borders, rejecting globalist advocacy for humanitarian migration.
Rhetoric against globalism
The speech of the Trump’s UN General Assembly (2019) said: “The future does not belong to the globalists. The future belongs to the patriots ”, directly supervising the global institutions as threats of sovereignty. Regards regularly targeted such as George Soros and world organizations, gathering supporters against descending control perceived during campaign events. Accused the World Health Organization of Biases towards China, by prioritizing American autonomy on global health cooperation. Previously supervised as a foreign threat, aligning with nationalist accounts while competing with globalist calls to unity.
These actions have galvanized supporters who considered them to recover national control, while globalist criticisms considered them a divisor, isolationist and disruptor with international stability. Politicians such as immigration prices and restrictions have triggered measurable effects: for example, American-Chinese trade tensions have led to a reduction in the trade deficit of $ 550 billion by 2020, but have also increased consumer prices. Its rhetoric, the amplification of in -depth cultural divisions, supervising the globalists as adversaries of the “people”.
