Trump’s Trade War Threatens Global Financial Stability, IMF Warns Amid Rising Market Volatility


The International Monetary Fund warned that the climbing of the trade war of President Donald Trump, anchored by waves of tariff taxation, could disentangle the fragile financial stability which has amortized the world banking system since the 2008 financial crisis.
In a report published Tuesday during its spring meetings with the World Bank in Washington, the IMF stressed that tariff exchanges in tit-form-tat, in particular between the United States and China, has shaken the markets through continents, causing a strong rethink of assets and an increase in volatility between actions, deals and obligations.
While the last series of prices was announced earlier this month, its shock waves are still measured in the global financial system.
Register For TEKEDIA Mini-MBA Edition 17 (June 9 – September 6, 2025)) Today for early reductions. An annual for access to Blurara.com.
Tekedia Ai in Masterclass Business open registration.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-INivest in large world startups.
Register become a better CEO or director with CEO program and director of Tekedia.
“Global risks of financial stability have increased considerably,” said the IMF. The agency warned that certain financial institutions, in particular those operating with a high lever effect, could cope with pressure in the event of an additional sale triggered by the deepening of geopolitical tensions.
Although the immediate reaction of the pricing announcements on April 2 has been “brutal”, the head of the IMF and IMF markets department, Tobias Adrian, stressed that it was not yet messy. But the risks become too great to ignore.
“If things go very badly,” said Adrian, “we could find ourselves in a worrying place from a point of view of financial stability.”

The world fallout from American prices
The wider consequences of Trump’s aggressive commercial position are already felt in major economies. Steel prices, aluminum, semiconductors and other critical sectors have not only injured Chinese exporters, but also disrupted supply chains covering Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia. Many developing countries, whose savings are based strongly on inputs or manufacturing exports to markets linked to the United States, said a drop in growth forecasts and foreign investment invasion.
The European Union has threatened reprisals, while countries like Germany – the industrial power of Europe – have seen factory orders weaken under pressure from uncertainty and the reduction of demand. In Asia, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan, are faced with renewed risks in their high -tech and automotive sectors, the sectors deeply tangled with American and Chinese trade flows.
In the United States, prices have introduced inflationary pressure by increasing the costs of imported goods. US manufacturers and farmers, once at the heart of Trump’s support base, were among the hardest. The American Farm Bureau reports that the rates of reprisals by China and others led to a significant drop in agricultural exports. Meanwhile, companies report that the disruption of the supply chain increase operational costs, which are transmitted to consumers.

Exercise financial institutions
The IMF report pointed out that the financial system, although more resilient today than in 2008, is not immune to these shocks. While evaluations are starting to adapt, especially in highly exposed markets, the institutions that depend on the leverage to increase yields are at risk.
“A normalization of the prices of assets could trigger significant losses for certain institutions, in particular those which have aggressive investment strategies,” noted the report.
The “basic trade” is particularly worrying – a popular but risky arbitration strategy used by hedge funds to take advantage of creation errors in American government obligations. The IMF has long reported this trade as a potential source of systemic instability. Adrian noted that there had been a little progress of these positions, but so far, “it is quite contained.”
However, the message is clear: if the political rupture continues without control, the markets could quickly go from volatile to unstable.
Central alert banks
The IMF has urged central banks and financial regulators to be proactive. “The authorities should prepare to deal with financial instability by ensuring that financial institutions are ready to access the liquidity facilities of central banks and being prepared to intervene to resolve severe liquidity or the stress of market functions,” advised the report.
Banks are better capitalized today, thanks to post-crisis reforms like Basel III. But the IMF warned against complacency.
“We must guarantee the appropriate and complete implementation of all agreed financial reforms,” said the report, adding that capital stamps alone may not be enough to increase interconnectivity between banks and non-banques, including insurers, hedge funds and private credit lenders.
The IMF also seeks to all signs of disorderly liquidation in these interconnected institutions, which could ignite a cascade through the global financial network.
Trade war in a geopolitical pressure cooker
Beyond the rates, the IMF warned against the risks posed by the overlapping geopolitical tensions. The prolonged Russian invasion of Ukraine continued to distort the energy markets, while the Gaza conflict adds another layer of geopolitical uncertainty. Each influx composed on the nervous market and increases the probability of a major market correction.
The Bank of England added its voice to the choir earlier this month, warning that trade war and geopolitical instability “could harm financial stability by depressing growth”.
For the moment, the financial markets have avoided panic in its own right. There was no institutional failure and fears of the global recession did not materialize. But this balance is more and more fragile. Political investors and decision -makers look at Trump’s next movements. A misstep in commercial negotiations or a new tariff escalation could send the global financial system to an unknown territory.
Tobias Adrian hopes that tensions could facilitate, offering a path to stability. “There is also a possibility that there is a resolution of these tensions,” he said.
However, the IMF advises savings not to take risks. His advice: stay vigilant, be ready and do not assume that the system lies in shocks. Indeed, as the Trump administration propels itself with its combative commercial program, the world economy could soon be tested in a way that it has not been since the collapse of Lehman Brothers.