While countries like the United States explore crypto as a new campaign collection tool, the Ministers of the United Kingdom ring the alarm, with a demanding the prohibition of crypto donations concerning concerns about traceability and foreign interference.
On Tuesday, Pat McFadden, a Minister of the Office Cabinet, said that he thought there was one case to prohibit such donations, given the difficulty of tracing.
McFadden approached the subject after being questioned by the member of the Labor Party Liam Byrne about the ban on cryptographic fundraising, claiming that the United Kingdom should always keep its “legislation up to date to ensure that the funding of politics can trust the public.
The financing of democracy is often a controversial area, but I think it is very important that we know who provides the donation, are they correctly registered, what are the good deal of this donation. I think this is a very important question you have asked.
While crypto donations have grown in the United States, where figures like US President Donald Trump have openly courted the digital asset sector, the decrease in the United Kingdom reflects an increasing divergence in the way governments are approaching the intersection of crypto and democracy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fftk-hfgri
McFadden Byrne said that the potential influence of the crypto on politics could be addressed by further funding the National Crime Agency and the UK’s electoral commission.
The debate occurs two months after the British reform party of Nigel Farage announced that it would become the first political party in the United Kingdom to accept political gifts in Bitcoin.
An anti-corruption Watchdog with non-profit based in the United Kingdom has recently published a report indicating that the risk of foreign entities or criminal funds entering British policy is increased by authorizing Crypto donations. He noted that crypto could contribute to “future political interference plans”.
RElated: Clarity Act is not perfect, but it is the bill that the US Congress must adopt this summer
Countries and states repel cryptographic contributions
The United Kingdom is not the only country that pushes crypto donations to political parties. In 2022, Ireland prohibited all cryptographic contributions to political entities to protect its democracy against the threat of foreign interference. The amendment also discussed disinformation and transparency information for political parties and the rules governing foreign donations.
In the United States, several states, including Oregon, Michigan and North Carolina, have prohibited crypto donations from political campaigns due to concerns about traceability, transparency and respect for electoral finance laws. In 2018, California prohibited Crypto donations, but this legislation was repealed in 2022.
Related: El Salvador has bought 240 bitcoin since the IMF non accumulation agreement
El Salvador, a country that has adopted Bitcoin perhaps more than any other, has no ban on cryptography donations. However, in 2022, a civic group called Acción Ciudadana warned against the lack of supervision in the political funding of El Salvador, where the status of tender of Bitcoin could leave the door wide open to organized crime or to foreign actors to influence the elections in an anonymous manner.
While crypto donations are increasing worldwide, legislators and politicians continue to fight against the regulatory gaps that digital assets expose. In the American elections in 2024, cryptocurrency companies spent $ 134 million cumulative dollars to support pro-Crypto candidates, feeding both momentum and concern.
Magazine: U-Tour de sec on the crypto leaves key questions unanswered
