THE S&P 500 experienced a dramatic peak followed by a net retirement due to a false report saying that President Trump envisaged a 90 -day break on prices for all countries except China. The rumor, which comes from a misinterpretation of the comments made by the director of the National Economic Council Kevin Hassett during Fox News Interview, triggered a rapid reaction on the market. The wave of Hassett – “The president will decide what the president will decide” – has been misinterpreted and amplified on social networks and the media like CNBC and Reuters, causing a brief increase in optimism among investors.
The S&P 500, which had been declining significantly earlier in the day in the middle of the current uncertainty linked to the price, rallied suddenly. According to real -time financial data, the index has gone from a hollow of approximately 487.789 to an intra -day level nearly 524.79, reflecting a swing of around 8% in just 30 minutes. This increase briefly added billions of dollars of market value while investors reacted to the prospect of temporary relief from Trump aggressive trade policies. However, the White House quickly demystified the report as “Fake News” “ And stocks have dropped. At the end of the exchanges on April 8, 2025, the S&P 500 settled at 496.48, down compared to the closing of 504.38 of the day before, – a modest decline of around 1.6% – watering most of the previous gains.
This wild swing highlights the extreme sensitivity of the market to business policies, in particular Trump prices, which had already caused significant volatility in the previous time. The episode also underlines the speed with which disinformation can move the markets in a desperate environment for positive news, only for reality to reaffirm once the truth has emerged. Real -time data show the intraday volatility of the S&P 500 on April 8, the prices falling at 487,836 towards the end of the day before ending at 496.48, reflecting the rapid re -evaluation of the market after the dissipation of false hope.
Register For TEKEDIA Mini-MBA Edition 17 (June 9 – September 6, 2025)) Today for early reductions. An annual for access to Blurara.com.
Tekedia Ai in Masterclass Business open registration.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-INivest in large world startups.
Register become a better CEO or director with CEO program and director of Tekedia.
The rapid 8% swing in the S&P 500 within 30 minutes reveals how the nervous markets concern trade policy under the administration of President Trump. Prices were a central engine of uncertainty, investors hanging on each rumor or signal on climbing or potential relief. This event suggests that even unaccountable news can trigger disproportionate reactions, amplifying volatility in an already tense environment. In the future, markets can remain on board, subject to excessive reactions as long as the ambiguity of trade policy persists.
The episode highlights the risks of disinformation in the digital age rapidly evolving. The initial gathering was fueled by a bad reading of the waves of Kevin Hassett, amplified by the media and social platforms, to collapse when the White House intervened. Be that as it may, this complicates the ability to separate the signal from the noise, potentially leading to more erratic market behavior.
For day merchants and algorithmic systems, the event was a gold mine – until it was not. The clearly rewarded tip and decline probably rewarded people fast enough to buy and collect, while punishing slower retail investors or those captured in the retire. This highlights the double -cutting nature of volatility: it creates a profit potential but also exposes participants to sudden reversals. With the reactive markets, risk management becomes critical, in particular for leverage positions.
Pressure on political decision -makers for more clarity
The wilderness of the market could push the Trump administration to clarify its tariff position as soon as possible. The rapid denial of the White House of the 90 -day break of break shows the awareness of economic issues, but the initial ambiguity of Hassett’s comments suggests that the discipline of communication remains unequal. Investors and companies, already tense by cost increases related to prices and disruptions of the supply chain, can require more concrete advice to stabilize expectations, although Trump’s unpredictable style could maintain high uncertainty.
Beyond the S&P 500, the event reflects deeper economic fault lines. A real 90 -day tariff break could have reduced the pressure on inflation (already high commercial costs) and strengthened the sectors such as manufacturing and retail, which have been hardly affected by import rights. False hope and subsequent disappointment can strengthen the lowering feeling, especially if the climbing of prices continues. Consumer confidence and companies’ profits could take a hit if the markets interpret this as a sign of prolonged commercial friction, potentially slowing GDP growth projections for 2025.
Repeated incidents like this could change the way investors approach the market. If volatility becomes the norm, we could see a flight to safer assets – think of links or gold – or a heavier dependence on coverage strategies such as options. Conversely, some may double speculative parts, betting on the next rumor point. Be that as it may, the episode strengthens that fundamental principles (such as income or economic data) take a rear seat for a risk in line in the current climate. This roller coaster of the ephemeral market is a microcosm of the economic landscape of 2025: fragile, rumor and Treetting on the edge of the Trump’s commercial agenda.
