The World Bank Group has imposed a 30-month debarment on two Nigerian companies, Viva Atlantic Limited and Technology House Limited, and their Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Norman Bwuruk Didam, for engaging in fraudulent, collusive and corrupt practices linked to the National Social Safety Net Project (NSSNP).
The move follows an extensive investigation by the Washington-based institution, which revealed serious violations of its anti-corruption framework. The findings revealed that during the 2018 procurement and contracting phases, companies and their CEOs were involved in actions including false statements, falsification of documents and bribery.
According to the World Bank, Viva Atlantic Limited and Technology House Limited misrepresented their experience, falsified manufacturer authorization letters, and concealed conflicts of interest in their bids. These actions allowed them to access confidential tender information through collusion with public officials, thereby compromising the transparency and integrity of the procurement process. Companies also offered incentives to civil servants to obtain contracts, violating basic principles of accountability and fairness.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (February 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia Masterclass on AI in Business open registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and meninvest in the best startups in Africa here.
In its official statement, the World Bank condemned these actions as fraudulent, collusive and corrupt, emphasizing that they were in direct contravention of the institution’s strict anti-corruption policies.
“According to the facts of the case and the general principles of the World Bank Anti-Corruption Framework, in connection with a 2018 procurement and subsequent contract, Viva Atlantic Limited, Technology House Limited and Mr. Didam presented erroneously a conflict of interest in companies. tender letter and received confidential tender information from public officials, which constituted fraudulent and collusive practices respectively.
“Furthermore, Viva Atlantic Limited and Mr. Didam misrepresented Viva Atlantic Limited’s experience and submitted falsified manufacturer authorization letters, and also offered and provided valuable items to public project officials. These actions were fraudulent and corrupt practices respectively,” the statement said.
Consequences of exclusion
The World Bank sanctions mean that Viva Atlantic Limited, Technology House Limited and Norman Bwuruk Didam cannot participate in any projects funded by the World Bank Group for the next 30 months. As part of a negotiated settlement, the sanctioned parties acknowledged their misconduct and agreed to meet strict integrity conditions to be eligible for reinstatement after the exclusion period.
The bank’s decision highlights its zero-tolerance approach to corruption and sends a strong signal to other contractors and stakeholders about the consequences of engaging in unethical practices. However, this case also highlights significant vulnerabilities in Nigeria’s governance frameworks, which must be addressed to prevent future offenses of this nature.
The scandal has reignited concerns about systemic corruption within Nigeria’s financial and public procurement sectors. For years, the country’s financial sector has struggled with a reputation for fraud and lack of accountability, often casting a shadow over its ability to effectively manage development funds.
This development highlights the persistence of these challenges, despite the efforts of international organizations and local authorities to improve governance standards. The NSSNP, designed to provide financial assistance to vulnerable populations across Nigeria, is now facing credibility issues, raising questions about the effectiveness of control mechanisms and its broader impact on intended beneficiaries.
The integrity of the entire procurement process was compromised by allowing misrepresentations of qualifications and falsification of critical documents. This casts doubt on the widespread use of such practices in other donor-funded initiatives.
Implications for development projects in Nigeria
The NSSNP, a crucial initiative aimed at reducing poverty and supporting Nigeria’s most vulnerable populations, is now tainted by this corruption scandal. These revelations threaten to erode public and international confidence in Nigeria’s ability to effectively manage large-scale development projects.
Financial analysts note that this case highlights the urgent need for stricter oversight of public procurement processes in Nigeria, particularly for donor-funded projects. They further note that improved governance frameworks, better monitoring mechanisms and stricter sanctions for violations are essential to restore trust and ensure that funds reach their intended beneficiaries.
It was noted that for Nigeria to continue to attract international support for its development agenda, it must demonstrate its commitment to eradicating corruption. Anti-corruption advocates are now calling for the World Bank’s intervention to serve as a catalyst for reforms within the country’s public and private sectors, particularly in the management of social programs and other crucial initiatives.
